Chicago Cubs super prospect first baseman Anthony Rizzo may soon be coming to the MLB level. Rizzo has dominated at the AAA level with the Iowa Cubs, hitting .367 (.426 OBP and 1.173 OPS) with 22 home runs and 57 RBIs through 60 games. Cubs fans have been clamoring for his promotion for months; however, there is one obstacle remaining: Epstein’s lie.
Theo Epstein reportedly wants Rizzo to play 162 games at the AAA level; his reasoning was because the MLB experience is 162 games. That is a load of bull and anybody with a brain knows it! Rizzo played 93 games in AAA last season; therefore, he would need 69 games this season to reach that magical 162-game number. What kind of fools does Epstein take the fans to be? Everybody knows the MLB experience is not 93 games, an offseason, then 69 more games. His 162-game rationale is nothing but a smokescreen which masks the real reason Rizzo has yet to be called up: money/control.
By waiting until after June 23 this season to call Rizzo up, the Cubs would maintain control to Rizzo’s rights and he would not become a free agent until 2018; if the Cubs had called him up prior to June 23 and kept him there, he would have become eligible for free agency in 2017.
Anybody with a brain knows Rizzo has been MLB-ready for a while now. Rizzo is not only MLB-ready, but also gives the Cubs their best chances of winning baseball games. Rizzo’s upside is also much greater than that of fellow first baseman and outfielder Bryan LaHair and also greater than that of the aging and overpaid outfielder Alfonso Soriano.
Remember: the Cubs can maintain control of Rizzo for an additional year if they wait until after June 23 to call him up. Coincidentally (or rather not), if Rizzo were to play every AAA game from this point forward, he would reach 162 career AAA games on Sunday, June 24 (one day after the June 23 Super-2 cutoff date for Rizzo).
Do not be fooled by Epstein’s lies. General managers lie about their reasons for taking certain actions in dealing with Super-2 prospects. They are cheapskates who wish to hold off as long as possible before having to pay their future all-stars the big bucks. It is my sincere hope that one day, a Super-2 prospect will realize this and refuse to sign with said club in the future when he reaches free agency. General managers are always alienating players in that manner, and it is despicable.
If I were a general manager of a Major League Baseball club, I would not care about Super-2 status whatsoever. My sole concern would be doing my job to the best of my ability to build a winning organization. If I felt a Super-2 prospect was MLB-ready and could handle the MLB experience, then I would call him up without hesitation and give him his shot. If he proves to be an all-star, then he will be worth the big bucks and I would gladly pay him. More importantly, I would establish that I am a general manager with whom players can negotiate in good faith.
Let us pretend we can gaze into a crystal ball and see the future. In the future, Rizzo becomes a perennial gold-glover and silver-slugger. He becomes a perennial MVP candidate and his name is uttered in the same sentence as Albert Pujols in the history of MLB greatness. But he is not doing this in a Cubs uniform; rather, he is performing to MVP standards in a St. Louis Cardinals uniform because he chose to leave the Cubs when he became a free agent in 2018. Rizzo felt jilted by how Epstein and the Cubs organization toyed around with him in 2012. The Cubs’ World Series drought continues as Cubs fans everywhere curse the name of Epstein and how he alienated Rizzo.
If I were a general manager, that is not a future I would want to create for myself or the organization I am employed by. By doing what he is doing, Epstein is running the risk of creating such a future for himself and the Cubs organization. Let me ask you, Mr. Epstein: was it worth it? Was risking the future worth one extra year? If Rizzo indeed becomes a superstar, then you better hope he has a very short memory.
June 1, 2012: history was made. Johan Santana pitched the first no-hitter in New York Mets history in their 8-0 victory over the St. Louis Cardinals. What made this feat especially impressive is that the Cardinals are arguably the best hitting team in baseball today. Santana threw a career-high 134 pitches (77 for strikes), struck out eight batters and walked five.
The 134 pitches and five walks are not no-hitter records. Edwin Jackson threw 149 pitches in his no-hitter for the Arizona Diamondbacks and walked eight (June 25, 2010). A.J. Burnett walked nine batters and threw 129 pitches in his no-hitter for the Florida Marlins (May 12, 2001).
The no-hitter marked the second consecutive complete game shutout for Santana, who improved to 3-2 on the season with a 2.38 ERA. In his previous start, Santana pitched a shutout against the San Diego Padres. Like all no-hitters, Santana had help on the side. His defense made spectacular plays when necessary; left fielder Mike Baxter robbed Cardinals catcher Yadier Molina of a hit in the seventh inning and injured himself in the process. Santana was also fortunate not to have lost the no-hit bid in the sixth inning as Cardinals outfielder – and former Mets player – Carlos Beltran hit the foul line on the third base side. Much of the ball was in foul territory; however, it was a fair ball for the imprint of the ball could be seen on the foul line chalk.
Santana’s detractors will likely state that this no-hitter should be marked with an asterisk; however, it is not going to happen. Get over it! Missed calls DO happen in baseball. Major League Baseball did not reverse any calls or place an asterisk on the game in which a blown call by the first base umpire cost Detroit Tigers pitcher Armando Galarraga a perfect game on June 2, 2010.
Those who own Santana in fantasy baseball leagues must be pleased with his efforts this season. Santana last lost on April 17; since then, Santana is 3-0 in his last eight starts with a 2.06 ERA and two shutouts. While Santana does not have the velocity he once had, he is clearly showing this season that he can still pitch at a high level.
Kyle Kendrick led the Philadelphia Phillies to a 4-0 victory over the St. Louis Cardinals while having pitched his first career shutout. The 4-0 victory marks the fourth consecutive victory for the Phillies, and their third consecutive victory over the Cardinals in this series.
If Charles Dickens wrote Kendrick’s bio, it would be entitled “A Tale of Two Pitchers” due to Kendrick’s lack of consistency. When Kendrick pitches, you never know if you will see the erratic pitcher who struggles to find the strike zone and then manages to throw the fattest strikes you will ever see, or if you will see the ground ball wizard who throws strikes and minimizes his pitch count. Lately, the Phillies have been seeing the latter form of Kendrick.
Kendrick needed only 94 pitches (70 strikes) to get through his first shutout. Although the Cardinals are currently without Allen Craig and Lance Berkman, they are still a very formidable hitting team. Kendrick kept the Cardinals offense grounded, as he amassed 14 ground balls and nine fly balls in his nine innings of work. In addition to his first career shutout, Kendrick notched his first win of the 2012 season (1-4, 4.10 ERA).
Although Kendrick’s overall numbers are unimpressive on the 2012 season, he is pitching to his potential recently. Through 22 innings in his last three starts, Kendrick is 1-1 with a 1.23 ERA, 0.77 WHIP, 12 strikeouts and two walks. In his past three starts, Kendrick has been a strike-throwing machine, having amassed 195 strikes and 96 balls (67% strike rate). In those three starts, Kendrick amassed 34 ground balls and 19 fly balls for an impressive 1.79 GB/FB ratio! Among Phillies starters, Kendrick’s 0.88 GB/FB ratio trails only Cliff Lee’s 1.27 this season.
As for the offense, Shane Victorino hit an RBI double to take the 1-0 lead in the 4th inning. John Mayberry Jr. hit a two-run double in the sixth, followed by a Freddy Galvis RBI groundout (also in the sixth).
In my Phillies 2012 preview, I made a bold statement: I said the Phillies offense would be better off without Howard. While I cannot say I have been right thus far, I cannot say that I was wrong, either. While the Phillies have lacked in run production at times this season, they are indeed a better hitting team than last season. In the 2011 season, the Phillies ranked 16th in the MLB with a .253 AVG. The Phillies currently rank fifth in the MLB with a .266 AVG.
In addition to the improved contact hitting, the Phillies are seeing a recent surge in their run production. During their current four-game winning streak, the Phillies scored 23 runs (nearly six runs per game). Over their past 11 games, the Phillies are 7-4 with 55 runs scored (five runs per game). This recent surge in run production is especially impressive in spite of the continuance of Jimmy Rollins’ season-long slump (Rollins did miss several games recently as he was on paternity leave).
The Phillies will attempt to sweep the Cardinals in this four-game series as Roy Halladay (4-4, 3.58 ERA) pitches against Adam Wainwright (3-5, 4.78 ERA).
- Although this was Kyle Kendrick’s first career shutout, it was his second career complete game
- Cardinals ace Adam Wainwright pitched a complete game shutout in his latest outing against the San Diego Padres
- Congratulations to Jimmy Rollins and his wife on the birth of their first child!
Remember a time when there was a lot of hype surrounding a Cuban defector named Aroldis Chapman? When Chapman was reportedly being pursued by the New York Yankees, Boston Red Sox and a handful of other MLB teams, fans of those teams were filled with immense hope and joined in on the hype. To everyone’s surprise, Chapman signed with the Cincinnati Reds and has not been as highly talked about since then. Chapman’s performance thus far in the 2012 season should revive the hype that once surrounded him.
At present time, Chapman is owned in 84% of Yahoo fantasy baseball leagues, and I expect that number to rise soon. I am one of his owners, as I drafted him in every league I participated in. Although the Reds signed Ryan Madson to be their closer, I drafted Chapman with the hope that he may be in the starting rotation and become a 200-strikeout pitcher. In the possible event that he never joins the rotation, I was still confident in his ability to register a high strikeout total. With Chapman apparently being the new closer – for now – with the Reds, his fantasy value has nowhere to go but up.
At present time, Chapman has a 0.00 ERA this season, with the lone run against him being unearned. In 22.1 innings, Chapman has 39 strikeouts, which amounts to a 15.72 K/9 rate. Chapman has walked seven and surrendered seven hits (0.63 WHIP). As dominating as Chapman has been, he did pitch his way out of several jams this season. Among all pitchers with 20 or more innings pitched, Chapman’s .093 AVG against ranks second only to the Oakland Athletics’ Ryan Cook (.060 AVG against).
After the strong start to his 2012 season, Chapman’s career numbers now sport a 2.42 ERA, 1.09 WHIP and 129 strikeouts in 85.2 innings (13.55 K/9 rate). As he continues to develop his changeup and his slider, he can conceivably be a much-improved pitcher in the future! Fantasy managers may have some recent concerns over Chapman, as he is reportedly being sued a large sum of money and was reportedly arrested for driving with a suspended license; however, if Chapman stays on the right path and does not do anything to jeopardize his career, he can become one of the more special pitchers in the game today (whether a starter or a reliever).
If you are in need of saves and/or strikeouts, you should add Chapman immediately in your leagues. Chapman is currently owned in 84% of Yahoo leagues and that number will continue to rise. If Chapman moves away from the bullpen and into the rotation at some point this season, you may have added a potential ace for free! Those of you participating in keeper leagues should add him without hesitation if he is available on the waiver wire. Regardless of whether or not you have any long-term plans for Chapman, somebody else may value him greatly in a keeper league. As Chapman continues to grow as a pitcher, so will his potential trade value, especially in the keeper leagues.
Every year in fantasy baseball, there are players who were overlooked during the drafts and later became fantasy all-stars and helped some fortunate manager to the fantasy baseball championship. It happens; that’s the beauty of fantasy baseball. Everybody loves to find that hidden gem that outperforms his draft position (if he was even drafted) and leave the other managers stupefied. Although there are always overlooked players, one player continues to be overlooked year after year: Adam LaRoche.
LaRoche is not a household name in the fantasy baseball world and thus does not get drafted very highly. LaRoche struggled mightily in 2011 with a labrum injury that ultimately ended his too-short season. According to Yahoo fantasy baseball, LaRoche has an average draft position (ADP) of 217.5 for the 2012 season. Write that number down on a piece of paper: 217.5!
From 2006 to 2010, LaRoche averaged 148 games played, 145 hits (37 doubles), 26 home runs and 89 RBIs per season while sporting a .273 AVG, .343 OBP and .836 OPS. In the 2010 season, LaRoche hit .261 with 25 home runs and a career-best 100 RBIs; he also had 146 hits (37 doubles) to go along with his .320 OBP and .788 OPS. While LaRoche’s 2010 totals and 2006 to 2010 averages are not Earth-shattering numbers, they are good numbers that are taken for granted. From 2006 to 2010, LaRoche was a poor man’s Ryan Howard in fantasy baseball, despite never sniffing Howard’s draft position!
I do not have any data about their ADPs prior to the 2012 drafts; however, I participated in a fantasy league with some colleagues last season. In that league, Howard was taken with the 13th overall pick; LaRoche went undrafted in a 190-picks draft.
As you can see from the numbers below, LaRoche was very similar to Howard in most offensive categories in those five seasons; LaRoche hit more doubles, struck out less frequently and walked less frequently while Howard hit more home runs and walked more frequently.
Due to his power numbers, Howard is certainly a more valuable fantasy hitter than LaRoche; however, LaRoche’s well-rounded numbers and extremely late ADP (217.5) are indications that a manager can use the earlier rounds to fulfill needs at other positions and nab LaRoche in the later rounds at a bargain. While LaRoche’s 2006 to 2010 numbers do not sound entirely elite, they are stronger numbers than they are given credit for.
Let us compare LaRoche’s 2006 to 2010 averages to other players with 1B eligibility in the 2011 season. In this season’s drafts, there were 32 players with 1B eligibility that had a better ADP than LaRoche. Of those 32 players, 15 of them hit more than 26 home runs in 2011. Of those 32, 14 of them had more than 89 RBIs and 21 of them hit higher than a .273 AVG. However, among those 32 players, only eight of them had better numbers in all three categories in the 2011 season!
1B who surpassed .273 AVG, 26 HR and 89 RBIs in 2011
Berkman, Lance: .301 AVG, 31 HR, 94 RBI
Cabrera, Miguel: .344 AVG, 30 HR, 105 RBI
Fielder, Prince: .299 AVG, 38 HR, 120 RBI
Gonzalez, Adrian: .338 AVG, 27 HR, 117 RBI
Konerko, Paul: .300 AVG, 31 HR, 105 RBI
Morse, Michael: .303 AVG, 31 HR, 95 RBI
Pujols, Albert: .299 AVG, 37 HR, 99 RBI
Votto, Joey: .309 AVG, 29 HR, 103 RBI
Only eight first basemen in the 2011 season were able to topple what LaRoche averaged through a five-season span in AVG, home runs and RBIs. While LaRoche’s perceived value will never match that of these aforementioned hitters, he is nevertheless in good company with his statistics. Despite his productivity, LaRoche continues to be overlooked and undervalued in fantasy baseball. Thus far, LaRoche seems to be on a strong recovery from his season-ending woes of 2011. Through 37 games, LaRoche has a .313 AVG, .403 OBP and .962 OPS. LaRoche currently has 42 hits (10 doubles), seven home runs, 31 RBIs, 23 walks and 36 strikeouts.
If LaRoche were to play every game for the rest of the season and maintain his current rate of production, he would finish with 179 hits (42 doubles), 29 home runs, 132 RBIs, 98 walks and 153 strikeouts in 158 games! These MVP-caliber numbers are highly unlikely for LaRoche; however, it would be fair to possibly project a .280 AVG and 90-plus RBIs. LaRoche averaged a .273 AVG, 26 home runs and 89 RBIs from 2006 to 2010 and it is possible that he may surpass those numbers this season. It is too early in the season to say that he will break those numbers with any certainty, but it is also too early to write off the possibility. I believe there is a very real possibility that LaRoche may have the best season of his MLB career this year.
From 2006 to 2010, LaRoche had a .414 BB/K ratio; he currently has a .571 BB/K ratio. From 2006 to 2010, LaRoche walked in 9.64% of his plate appearances; thus far in 2012, LaRoche has walked in 12.99% of his plate appearances. From 2006 to 2010, LaRoche struck out in 23.27% of his plate appearances; consistent to his nature, LaRoche has struck out in 22.73% of his plate appearances this season. Although it is still early in the season and great changes can occur at any time to a player’s statistics, LaRoche’s much-improved BB/K ratio and walk rate indicate that he may be a much more disciplined hitter now than he was earlier in his career.
Only time will tell if LaRoche will set new career-bests this season. Nevertheless, this examination of his statistics from 2006 to 2010, his much-improved walk rate and his much-improved BB/K ratio indicate that he may be taking his game to a new level he never reached before. LaRoche is indeed an undervalued fantasy first baseman.
On May 14, 2012, Placido Polanco became baseball’s newest member of the 2,000-hit club. Polanco’s 2,000th career hit was delivered in dramatic fashion, as he hit his first home run of the season – a two-run shot – in the late innings of the Philadelphia Phillies’ 5-1 victory against the Houston Astros.
Polanco is the 269th player in MLB history to reach 2,000 career hits. While Polanco is by no means a future Hall-of-Famer, collecting 2,000 hits is still an impressive feat and should not be scoffed at by baseball fans. How difficult is it to collect 2,000 hits in a career? If a player registered 13 seasons of 150 hits, he would have 1,950 hits (50 hits short). In other words, a player would have to reach 150 hits in 13 of 14 MLB seasons to reach 2,000 career hits. To put that in perspective: Hall-of-Famer Wade Boggs (3,010 career hits) only had 11 150-hit seasons in his 18-season career!
To reach 2,000 hits, a player would have to be not only somewhat injury-free, but he must also be lucky enough to receive many at-bats in a season. If a player receives 500 at-bats in a season, then he must finish the season with a .300 AVG (150 hits in 500 at-bats is a .300 AVG). Hitting .300 for 13 out of 14 seasons is no small task. If a player cannot remain that consistent, he will need to be fortunate enough to have more than 500 at-bats in some seasons and collect some 200-hit seasons.
Although Boggs only had 11 150-hit seasons in his 18-year MLB career, he was a dominant player at times. In 1985, Boggs posted his best season with 161 games played and a staggering 240 hits (Boggs achieved 200-plus hits seven times in his career)! For his career, Boggs averaged 200 hits and 609 at-bats per 162 games played. In his 18 MLB seasons, Boggs appeared in less than 150 games 12 times. In the 2011 MLB season, only 19 players had 600 or more at-bats; 15 of them had 609 or more at-bats.
If 2,000 hits – the equivalent of hitting .300 (150/500) for 13 out of 14 seasons – seems difficult enough, achieving a Boggs-like 3,000 hits is more tremendously difficult. Achieving 3,000 hits would be the equivalent of 20 150-hit seasons (Boggs only played 18 seasons and achieved 150 hits 11 times). Baseball fans should comprehend the great difficulty in achieving 2,000 hits, let alone 3,000 and appreciate the long-term productivity that players display in achieving either of those milestones. Below is a list of some notable players who failed to reach the 2,000-hit club (currently active players are noted by *).
Jeff Conine: 1,982 hits (.285 AVG)
Fred Lynn: 1,960 hits (.283 AVG)
*Jason Giambi: 1,954 hits (.281 AVG)
*Carlos Beltran: 1,953 hits (.283 AVG)
Jim Edmonds: 1,949 hits (.284 AVG)
Steve Sax: 1,949 hits (.281 AVG)
Juan Gonzalez: 1,936 hits (.295 AVG)
Devon White: 1,934 hits (.263 AVG)
Gil Hodges: 1,921 hits (.273 AVG)
*David Ortiz: 1,807 hits (.285 AVG)
“Shoeless” Joe Jackson: 1,772 hits (.356 AVG)
Shoeless Joe’s final MLB season was in 1920 before the bans of the players involved in the “Black Sox” scandal went into effect. At that time, Jackson was 32 years of age. It is reasonable to assume he would have reached 2,000 hits with ease; however, 3,000 hits would have been difficult even for the great Shoeless Joe. Several of my favorite players also failed to reach 2,000 career hits: Sean Casey (.302 AVG) had 1,531 hits and John Kruk (.300 AVG) had 1,170 hits.
In my opinion, Atlanta Braves third baseman Chipper Jones is a future first-ballot Hall-of-Famer. Jones (.304 career AVG) currently has 2,642 hits. Jones – who is 40 years of age – might have been approaching – if not already having surpassed – 3,000 hits at this time if it were not for the misfortune of missing many games over the years due to injuries. For Jones to reach the heralded 3,000-hit milestone, he would certainly have to play beyond the 2012 MLB season. The fact that Jones is this close to 3,000 hits is even more remarkable when one considers how many games he missed due to injuries over the years and how many walks he draws on a regular basis each season.
I hope my readers now have a greater understanding and appreciation for the difficulty involved in achieving milestones. Even if a milestone like 2,000 hits is not a Hall-of-Fame benchmark, it is still an impressive feat that required long-term consistency and should be appreciated.
For professional baseball players, Opening Day officially begins with the first scheduled regular season game; for fantasy baseball junkies, it begins on the day of their fantasy baseball draft(s).
Regardless of what expertise one professes to have in regards to baseball and its players, the events of a 162-game season are very unpredictable. Fantasy pundits can project numbers for players to their hearts’ content; however, slumps and injuries do happen. I do not believe one ever wins a league title on the day of their draft; however, one can certainly lose on draft day. If you are lucky, you will go into the month of May without having your lineup resembling the Bubonic Plague.
An important aspect of being a good fantasy manager is the ability to pull off trades. Approach trades with the mindset of quality over quantity. Making X amount of trades does not make you a good manager if those trades failed to benefit your team in any way. In a competitive league that is run fairly, league members – or their commissioner – will vote down wholly unfair trades. Incredibly lopsided trade offers may also result in a prompt rejection and the other manager telling you to go screw yourself (it can also happen with reasonable trade offers). I will not advise you on trading etiquette and how to improve your people skills. I shall illustrate my thought process as to the risks/rewards of potential trades and advise you the following: sometimes getting what you wanted is a bad thing for your team.
When I say getting what you wanted can be a bad thing for your team, I do not mean one of those “What the hell was he thinking?” deals that were bad enough to warrant such a question (but good enough to not be vetoed). I am going to discuss the little details in potential deals that many fantasy managers tend to overlook in what may be widely regarded as fair deals for both teams. I shall use the lineup from one of my own fantasy teams and a competitor’s team to serve these examples.
My 1B-eligible players
1B Adam Dunn: 22/89 (.247 AVG), 7 HR, 19 RBI, .947 OPS
1B/OF Kendrys Morales: 23/75 (.307 AVG), 2 HR, 8 RBI, .782 OPS
1B Adam LaRoche: 28/90 (.311 AVG), 4 HR, 17 RBI, .903 OPS
1B/OF Bryan LaHair: 26/67 (.388 AVG), 7 HR, 16 RBI, 1.289 OPS
His 1B-eligible players
1B/3B Kevin Youkilis (DL): 14/64 (.219 AVG), 2 HR, 9 RBI, .636 OPS
1B/2B/OF Michael Cuddyer: 24/85 (.282 AVG), 2 HR, 12 RBI, .826 OPS
1B Ike Davis: 16/89 (.180 AVG), 3 HR, 8 RBI, .524 OPS
As you can see from the above numbers, I have plenty of offensive production eligible for the 1B position. My potential trade partner must place Kevin Youkilis on the DL and will likely keep Michael Cuddyer in his 2B slot; this leaves a mightily struggling Ike Davis to play in his 1B slot. Naturally, it would make sense to approach him with a trade offer. In this particular case, I may try to offer Adam LaRoche to him for something I need on my team. At present time, I have a need for saves in the head-to-head fantasy baseball league in which we participate. One of his closers is Jonathan Papelbon (nine saves, 11 strikeouts, 0.82 ERA and 0.82 WHIP).
With Adam Dunn, Kendrys Morales and Bryan LaHair all eligible for first base, I do not feel I would greatly miss LaRoche if I were to trade him. If I were to offer LaRoche for Papelbon, that would indeed help me in saves; however, I must pause to reflect and see if it would be a good deal for me. Below are the scenarios I envision for both my own perspective and the other manager’s perspective.
1. Davis is struggling and I need help. Sure, it’s a deal!
2. Youkilis will bounce back eventually. Why trade for LaRoche when I can add Todd Helton? NO DEAL!
3. You know how hard it will be for me to replace Papelbon? Go screw yourself. NO DEAL!
1. I am confident in Dunn, Morales and LaHair. Goodbye, LaRoche!
2. Papelbon is an excellent closer and I need help at the position. Goodbye, LaRoche!
3. Why should I trade a potential 90-RBI hitter for a closer? I BETTER NOT!
With the above scenarios I created, anybody can reasonably understand any of the three viewpoints in the other manager’s perspective; likewise, anybody will understand the viewpoints I created for my own perspectives in situations one and two. Some of you may find my third scenario confusing, as my reluctance to make such an offer sounds like it contradicts my faith in my other 1B-eligible hitters. Frankly, my faith in my other hitters is not shaky. The basis of my third scenario is what I like to call “practical evaluation.”
LaRoche hit 25 home runs and 100 RBIs in his last fully healthy season back in 2010. If he were to hit 20 home runs and 90 RBIs this season, that would be very productive indeed.
It is not the loss of LaRoche’s production that holds me back from trading him; it is THE OTHER MANAGER’S GAIN that holds me back from making such an offer. Too many fantasy managers think about the numbers that they expect from players and assume any deal that helps them in a category is a beneficial deal for them.
Getting a player in return who helps you in a category of need is not always beneficial for your team, especially if the player you trade away has a greater impact on the other manager’s team than your newly-acquired player has on your team.
Imagine that the other manager is very eager to trade Papelbon to me for LaRoche (that may be a stretch, but just humor me here). LaRoche helps him in multiple offensive categories and Papelbon helps me in saves; concept-wise, this is a mutually beneficial deal.
If you examine the potential deal more deeply, you will understand the ramifications of such a deal. For example, the other manager has what I believe to be a good offensive lineup. His top-tier hitters include Matt Kemp, Carlos Gonzalez and David Wright. With the addition of LaRoche, he may see improvement in his team’s overall collection of hits, home runs, RBIs and OPS in any given week in the weekly head-to-head league in which we participate. LaRoche could conceivably have a profound positive impact on his fantasy team. His lineup will be even stronger if Youkilis returns healthy; LaRoche could then serve in the utility slot with his production.
What do I have to gain from Papelbon? Obviously, the acquisition of Papelbon would lead to more saves for me (a statistic in which I’m sorely lacking). Unfortunately in a head-to-head league, that is not a good enough return for me. Look at the use of a closer in a practical manner: if you are lucky, a closer will pitch anywhere from two to five innings in a given week; Papelbon has only pitched five innings in the past 14 days (two and a half innings per week)!
The two to five innings I would likely receive from Papelbon would only be a small fraction of the innings pitched from my starting pitchers; therefore, Papelbon would have virtually no dramatically positive effect on my ERA and WHIP.
The low amount of innings closers pitch in a given week will also amount to a strikeout total which pales in comparison to one’s collection of starting pitchers.
While Papelbon would improve my totals in saves, that does not guarantee I would obtain victory each week in the saves category, as I currently have the fewest saves in the league with Jason Motte and Carlos Marmol as my closers (Marmol is at risk to lose the closer job at this time).
As I already stated, my opinion is that my opponent has a good offensive lineup. Why should I take the risk of giving him LaRoche (free offense) for a closer who may or may not have any impact on the overall success of my fantasy team, especially when the acquisition of LaRoche could possibly turn his good offensive lineup into an improved offensive lineup? At this early stage in the season, I am dominating the league in offensive categories and most pitching categories; therefore, it would make no sense for me to strengthen the multiple offensive categories of my competition in pursuit of ONE statistic (saves).
If my opponent had a weak offensive lineup and I saw it as no threat to mine in offensive categories, I would be more eager to trade with him for a closer. Because my opponent has a strong lineup, I have no desire to further strengthen it for him.
Remember: getting what you want or need is not always a good thing in fantasy baseball trades. The player you trade away may not hurt your numbers; however, he may strengthen your opponent’s numbers and be used against you. Knowing your team’s strengths and weaknesses is a must; however, knowing the strengths and weaknesses of your competition is also a must. Regardless of whether a competitor is strong or weak, you do not want to strengthen that competitor too greatly.
Before committing to a trade, be sure to ask yourself if a potential deal will help you as greatly as it helps your competition or if it may become a danger to your fantasy team’s success in the league. A player who may be riding the bench on your deep team may be another manager’s greatest treasure.
Do not fall for concept talk and do not be blinded by just statistics: you must attempt to weigh reward versus risk in any deal you pursue. If the risks too greatly outweigh the rewards, then you must restrain yourself from making such a deal, no matter how good it may look on paper.